22Jan/12Off
Ford Commercial Response
www.youtube.com Thanks first and foremost to Ford for having the courage to run this ad. A giant THANK YOU to the 99% of you who have posted on here. For those who think this is all fake or personal responsibility no longer matters in this Country, we will keep trying to help you understand the greatness of this Great Nation. Thanks again to Ford and to all you great Americans out there! God bless Chris
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
Chis probably isn’t an actor. He’s probably the president of marketing for Ford.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
Chris is probably the marketing manager for Ford.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
Awesome!
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
‘m a Ford superduty Diesel customer! i love my truck to death i’m a very proud owner. i have had nothing but good luck
Keep it up Brother good work on kicking the competition $@#+!!! I know wait people say! Cummins that Cummins this But for fact they are not going to have that engin for long cummins sayed $@#+!!! you guy. you guy got bought by fiat now good luck. so that means for chevy to there truck are pieces of $@#+!!!!!! So That means for truck guys go with ford there American made!
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
ew years ago two parents went out to dinner.a few hours later,the babysitter was calling to see if she could cover up the clown statue in the kid’s room,the father said”Get the kids out of the house,we’ll call the police we don’t have a clown statue”.”the clown statue” was actually a killer that escaped from jail.if you don’t post this on 10 videos tonight the clown will be in your bed at 3:00 am with a chainsaw in his hand. sorry don’t want this to happen to me
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
The Treasury Department dramatically boosted its estimate of losses from its $85 billion auto industry bailout by more than $9 billion in the face of General Motors Co.’s steep stock decline.
In its monthly report to Congress, the Treasury Department now says it expects to lose $23.6 billion, up from its previous estimate of $14.33 billion.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
694 Americans 24 Commie scum
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@oldschoolpaulie Wrong! This is all about marketing. Now how many vehicles do you think the Ford Motor Company sold because of the backlash created when the Obama administration pressured Ford to pull this ad? Ford wins!
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
WOMEN IN FORD FOCUS COMMERCIAL DRINKING GAME, PASS IT ON!
We just saw these commercials and tried to Google to see who she is too. We haven’t had any luck. We just starting a game now to find out who that women is. PLEASE post if we find out who she is. It’s a new drinking game now. Whenever she comes on in any of those commercials we drink when she is onscreen and chug when she speaks (rarely) please feel free to play. Pass it on!!!!
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
GREAT VIDEO!!!!!!! GOD BLESS!!!!!!
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@minowekay first, let me say sorry about not responding sooner. i didn’t get this response in my messages.
not according to gm or the government…gm ‘paid back the loans early’. ford, however, paid back part of its loans to the government (loans totaling about $25 billion in 2006) by getting ‘grants’, essentially, to build electric and hybrid cars in china with its chinese partner Changan Automobile Group.
gm did and do similar.
these cars may wind up in the u.s.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@MrMotocall You left one off the list. He can without charges proof or due process add any citizen he sees as a threat to a Secret Kill @ Vanish List
After seeing how infantile and paranoid this Racist Liberal Nazi Obama can be,that would be most of us
It wouldn’t surprise me if the head of Ford was not reminded of that Kill @ Vanish precedent
I don’t care which side of the tree these DC KOOKS choose to fall on,they’re all just a bunch of the same brand of manufactured Despotic FRUITS & NUTS
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@neoconsnightmare3 Didn’t GM pay back “the government” (us) with more borrowed money?
Whatever, those people and pension funds who had invested in SECURED GM & Chrysler bonds should never have been told they’d have to take pennies on the dollar — and if they didn’t agree, they were “greedy.” Total violation of existing bankruptcy law!!
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@seluagehya yes, there is a difference in HOW the loans were structured: ford mortaged EVERYTHING to the government, gm allowed governmental control in lieu of mortaging everything.
both had to go along certain plans (beyond the control or mortgaging issues) and both paid back.
in an ideal world, YES, the government should stay out of private industry. alas, ford and gm have MILLIONS of direct jobs, and hundreds of thousands indirect jobs associated with them.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@neoconsnightmare3 @neoconsnightmare3 The primary difference between Ford and the others, is Ford did not allow equivalent of a hostile takeover by the government. I’d rather the government hadn’t gotten into the business of loaning or loan guarantees; I’d rather the government had stayed out of the automotive industry to begin with! The federal government has overstepped it’s constitutional bounds, in my view, and is over-regulating business; creating impediments to economic success.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@MicroOrginisum and you can PROVE this conspiracy?
you can not trust what gm says if you choose, but if you have no proof you still have no proof.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@neoconsnightmare3 That’s just a huge conspiracy made up. And form the last commercial gm made about paying back their loans were proved to be false, that’s why i don’t trust one word gm has to say.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@MicroOrginisum yes, ford DID take LOANS from the government in 2006. mortgaged everything. but saved millions of jobs. they were loans that could not have been gotten from banks/private sources.
it’s no big deal.
and per the government and gm, the loan was paid back.
i don’t know what the big deal is. in both cases, millions of jobs were saved directly and indirectly.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@neoconsnightmare3 Ford didn’t take any money, and gm never really paid our government back.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@MrMotocall thing is, the administration may have questioned, but as a conservative paper said, beyond ‘whining’, what could they do? really?
that, and ford said they pulled the ad because it was on a four week cycle. given that they introduced THREE commercials since then, and two (black woman and white man) disappeared quickly, that’s probably the case.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
You’re the best, man. I’m really ticked off that my government can attempt to kill the 1st Amendment and censor or punish free speech. Makes people wonder what they are fighting for. The Obama Admn should never have stuck their nose into this commercial. Kinda scary actually. But the folks who saw what happened to Joe the Plumber and were fine with that (Democrat operatives and Ohio officials and releasing his tax info), smearing him in public, will vote for Obama again.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@pbn8tv cool. but i said that earlier. MILLIONS of direct jobs (working for ford or suppliers) and indirect jobs beyond that (restaurants, others that get money from the autoworkers).
hey, i’m glad we reached an accord (no pun intended).
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@neoconsnightmare3 Yes you and I are getting somewhere. I will concede the loans are favorable. Think of all the people that DEPEND on these Big 3 for jobs. I WANT them to have favorable business conditions. Generous, we can agree and I believe this is part of the proper roll of Govt. as you know NO bank could at any time provide such a loan. We still differ on taking ownership of a company in lieu of tax payer dollars at zero prcnt interest and obligation to repay. Thanks for the conversation
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@pbn8tv and, just so you know…i’m not bashing ford. as i said earlier, i LOVE their ford taurus sho. i think it’s one of the most beautiful four doors on the market. if it had been on the market when i purchased my accord, i would have had a hard time choosing.
January 22nd, 2012 - 07:00
@pbn8tv (cont):
3) gm ceded ‘control/ownership’, ford ‘ceded control/mortgaging’
4) BOTH paid their loans back.
5) ford and gm have massive operations in china. they also have large presence in canada.
i’ve got the facts correct. we may differ in opinion ( ‘wrong’ or ‘right’) but the FACTS are both gm and ford, like it or not, couldn’t have gotten similar LOANS in the open market.
ALL car manufacturers get their governments support. ford and gm were just the last to do it.